Invest in Trust as A Road to Superior Local Governance: A Proposal for Research
Trust in government, especially at local levels is an ongoing topic that interests and draws attention of researchers worldwide. When a government is trusted or is perceived as trustworthy people are more willing to cooperate which usually leads to a better performance. Despite the benefits that a government may gain from being trustworthy, in reality a government will decide to neglect a tendency to be trusted in favor of other incentives it views as more rewarding. The primary goal of this article is to discuss the meaning and all the elements of trust in order to propose to undertake a study to examine why or why not local government chooses to invest in trust using the relevant economists’ tool, the prisoner’s dilemma game theory model, to explain individual and group behavior in the trust relationship between local government and its citizens. Hence, to result in mutually beneficial outcomes, the concept of the Golden Rule will be proposed as a way to embrace investment in trust from both players in the game of trust to overcome distrust and take advantage of mutual cooperation by the local government and the citizen. The output of this article can act as a basis for knowledge that will be used in future relevant research, especially to carry forward practical recommendations on the promotion of trust for the local government and the citizen.
Bailey, T. (2002). On Trust and Philosophy. The Philosophy of Trust. Retrieved from http://www.open2.net/trust/downloads/docs/ontrust.pdf [Accessed on 27 June 2018].
Baldvinsdottir, G., Hagberg, A., Johansson, I., Jonäll, K., & Marton, J. (2011). Accounting research and trust: a literature review. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8, 382-424.
Barney, J.B., & Hansen, M.H. (1994). Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 175-190.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664-678.
Bromiley, P. & Cummings, L.L. (1995). Transactions Costs in Organizations with Trust. In R. Bies, B. Sheppard & R. Lewicki (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations (Vol. 5) (pp. 219-247). Greenwich, CT, USA: JAI Press.
Brülhart, M., & Usunier, J.C. (2012). Does the trust game measure trust? Economics Letters, 115(1), 20-23.
Chanley, V.A., Rudolph, T.J., & Rahn, W.M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239- 256.
Cheung, C.M., & Lee, M.K. (2006). Understanding consumer trust in Internet shopping: A multidisciplinary approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(4), 479-492.
Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2003). Trust in government: The significance of attitudes towards democracy, public sector and public sector reforms (Working Paper 7). Stein Rokkan Center for Social Studies and Bergen University Research Foundation, Washington, DC.
Coff, R. (2003). Bidding Wars over R&D intensive firms: Knowledge, opportunism and the market for corporate control. Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 74-85.
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2540 (1997). Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the Council of State. (in Thai)
Costa, A.C., Roe, R.A., & Taillieu, T. (2001). Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 225-244.
Dalton, R.J. (2000). Citizen attitudes and political behavior. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6-7), 912-940.
Determining Plan and Procedures in Decentralizations to the Local Administrative Organization B.E. 2542 (1999). Bangkok, Thailand: Office of the Council of State. (in Thai)
Erikson, E.H. (1963). Childhood and Society (2nd Ed.). New York, NY, USA: Norton.
Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity, Youth, and Crisis. New York, NY, USA: Norton.
Foster, C., & Frieden, J. (2017). Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics, 18(4), 511-535.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity (No. D10 301 c. 1/c. 2). New York, NY, USA: Free Press.
Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167-1230.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties” American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Greenwood, M., & Van Buren III, H.J. (2010). Trust and stakeholder theory: Trustworthiness in the organisation–stakeholder relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 425- 438.
Grix, J. (2004). The Foundations of Research. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Hardin, R. (1940). Trust and Trustworthiness. New York, NY, USA: Russell Sage Foundation.
Hetherington, M.J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4),791-808.
Hetherington, M.J. (2005). Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press.
Hill, C.W. (1990). Cooperation, opportunism, and the invisible hand: Implications for transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 500-513.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
Hosmer, L.T. (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379-403.
Huff, L., & Kelley, L. (2003). Levels of organizational trust in individualist versus collectivist societies: A seven-nation study. Organization Science, 14(1), 81-90.
James, H.S. Jr. (2002). The trust paradox: a survey of economic inquiries into the nature of trust and trustworthiness. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 47, 291- 307.
Johnson, N.D., & Mislin, A.A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(5), 865-889.
Kim, S. (2010). Public trust in government in Japan and South Korea: Does the rise of critical citizens matter? Public Administration Review, 70(5), 801-810.
Kim, S.E. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611-635.
Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2010). Trust in governance networks: Its impacts on outcomes. Administration & Society, 42(2), 193-221.
Koma, S.B. (2010). The state of local government in South Africa: Issues, trends and options. Journal of Public Administration, 45 (Special issue 1), 111-120.
Lamothe, M., & Lamothe, S. (2011). To trust or not to trust? What matters in local government-vendor relationships? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 867-892.
Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475-507.
Lewicki, R., Elgoibar, P., & Euwema, M. (2016). The tree of trust: Building and repairing trust in organizations. In Lewicki, R., Elgoibar, P., & Euwema, M. (Eds.), BuildingTrust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations (pp. 195–211). Basel, Switzerland: Springer.
Lewicki, R.J., & Bunker, B.B. (1995). Trust in relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(1), 583-601.
Lewis, J.D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.
Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21-40.
Luhmann, N. (1979), Trust and Power. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley & Sons.
McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., & Chervany, N.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473-490.
Monaghan, P. (2017). Sustainability in Austerity: How Local Government Can Deliver During Times of Crisis (pp. 1–10). New York, NY, USA: Routledge.
Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013). Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major US cities. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 351-358.
Myerson, R.B. (2013). Game Theory. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press. Nunkoo, R., & Ramkissoon, H. (2012). Power, trust, social exchange and community support. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 997-1023.
Nye, J. (1997). Introduction: The decline of confidence in government. In J.
Nye, S. Joseph, P. D. Zelikow, & D. C. King (Eds.), Why People Don’t Trust Government? (pp. 1– 19). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.
Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board (2007). The Eleventh National Economic and Social Development Plan B.E. 2555 – 2559 (A.D. 2012 – 2016). Retrieved from http://www.nesdb.go.th/nesdb_en/ewt_dl_link.php?nid=3786 [Accessed on 27 June 2018]. (in Thai)
Petersen, H., & Vredenburg, H. (2009). Corporate governance, social responsibility and capital markets: exploring the institutional investor mental model. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 9(5), 610-622.
Reitan, M., Gustafsson, K., & Blekesaune, A. (2015). Do local government reforms result in higher levels of trust in local politicians? Local Government Studies, 41(1), 156-179.
Rotter, J.B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665.
Rotter, J.B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443-452.
Rotter, J.B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1-7.
Soh, H., Reid, L.N., & King, K.W. (2007). Trust in different advertising media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(3), 455-476.
Suchanek, A. (2007). Ökonomische Ethik (2nd ed.). Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
Suchanek, A. (2012). Trust as basis for sustainable corporate value creation (HHL working paper, No. 111).
Suchanek, A. (2017). Corporate responsibility as the avoidance of relevant inconsistencies. In Sharma, R.R., Csuri, M., & Ogunyemi, K. (Eds.), Managing for Responsibility: a Sourcebook for an Alternative Paradigm (pp. 77-89). New York, NY, USA: Business Expert Press.
Van de Walle, S. (2017). Trust at Risk: Implications for EU Policies and Institutions. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38(6), 2655-2663.
Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320-330.
Wang, Y.D., & Emurian, H.H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 105-125.
Warm, D. (2011). Local government collaboration for a new decade: Risk, trust, and effectiveness. State and Local Government Review, 43(1), 60-65.
Williamson, O.E. (1974). The economics of antitrust: Transaction cost considerations. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 122(6), 1439-1496.
Williamson, O.E. (1993). Transaction cost economics meets Posnerian law and economics. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE)/Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 149(1), 99-118.
Wu, J.J., Chen, Y.H., & Chung, Y.S. (2010). Trust factors influencing virtual community members: A study of transaction communities. Journal of Business Research, 63(9- 10), 1025-1032.
Yang, K. (2006). Trust and citizen involvement decisions: Trust in citizens, trust in institutions, and propensity to trust. Administration & Society, 38(5), 573-595.
Zou, Y., & Jiang, S. (2010). The construction and challenges about the public trust in local government in China. Journal of Social Science Research, 5, 41-46.
Copyright (c) 2018 National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The article published and information contained in this journal such as text, graphics, logos and images is copyrighted by and proprietary to the National Research Council of Thailand.
The article will be published under a CC-BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org). This license means that anyone may freely read, download, distribute and make the article available to the public (in printed and electronic form), provided that the author and the journal as the source are acknowledged, whereas no commercial use is allowed and the work may not be altered, transformed or serve as the basis for a derivative work.