• Thanikun Chantra School of Social Innovation, Mae Fah Luang University
Keywords: non-electoral participation, peace and conflict, political participation, southern Thailand


The conflict areas in the southernmost provinces of Thailand--Yala, Pattani, Narathiwat, and four districts of Songkhla have a long history of resistance to the authority of the Thai central government. When most people think of ‘conflict’, they tend to imagine a confrontation that ends with violence. Interestingly, in spite of the ongoing attacks, the local people in the conflict areas of southern Thailand do not disregard political participation. The conflict and violence act as a trigger that stimulates people’s motivations to participate through non-violent means, largely due to experiencing violence and suffering. Therefore, due to concerns for the importance of political participation in the conflict area, this article would like to examine how the ongoing conflict impacts on non-electoral participation. Based on fieldwork in the Deep South of Thailand and interviews with both governmental and nongovernmental actors, as well as university students and lecturers, this article found that conflict and non-electoral participation can be linked in a positive way, in which conflict and violence lead to a greater desire for meaningful political participation; and when people participate, it leads to less violence. This article also emphasizes that when non-electoral participation is interrupted by either the Thai state or the militants, it could cause hesitation to participate nonviolently, which possibly contributes to more conflict and violent participation by people in the conflict area. The experiences of conflict and violence, instead of leading only to violent actions, also motivate people to be more active in politics through peaceful means as they seek to reduce suffering from the insurgent violence. While people in the conflict areas seem to have a significant increase in electoral participation which is a low-level of participation, nonelectoral participation, which is a higher-level of participation, seems to have a more mixed outcome. Three modes of non-electoral participation, namely participation through the state, participation through civil society, and participation through cyber society are discussed in this article.


Download data is not yet available.


Aphornsuvan, T. (2004). Origins of MalayMuslim ‘Separatism’ in Thailand. Working Paper 32, Asia Research Institute, National University of

Bellows, J., & Miguel, E. (2006). War and institutions: New evidence from Sierra Leone. American Economic Review, 96(2), 394-399.

Bercovitch, J., and R. Jackson (2009) Conflict Resolution in the TwentyFirst Century: Principles, Methods, and Approaches (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).

Blattman, C. (2009). From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American political Science review, 103(2), 231-247.

Christie, C. J. (1996). A Modern History of Southeast Asia: Decolonization, Nationalism and Separatism. New York: I. B. Tauris.

Eremenko M. (2011). Political participation: Model by Verba in the EU and Russia. Moscow: National Research University.

Fenton, N. & Barassi, V. (2011). Alternative Media and Social Networking Sites: The Politics of Individuation and Political Participation. The Communication Review, 14, 179-196.

Gellner, E. (1994). Conditions of Liberty: Civil Society and its Rivals. New York: Penguin Press.

Gowing, P. G. (1975). Moros and Khaek: The Position of Muslim Minorities in the Philippines and Thailand. Southeast Asian Affairs, 27-40.

Huntington, S. P., & Nelson, J. M. (1976). No easy choice: Political participation in developing countries. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

International Crisis Group. (2005). Southern Thailand: Insurgency, Not Jihad, Asia Report No, 98. Singapore/ Brussels: International Crisis Group).

MacGaffey, J. (1994). Civil society in Zaire: hidden resistance and the use of personal ties in class struggle. Civil society and the state in Africa, 169-89.

McCargo, D. J. (2008). Tearing Apart the Land: Islam and Legitimacy in Southern Thailand. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Neelapaijit, A. (2009). Roles and Challenges for Muslim Women in the Restive Southern Border Provinces of Thailand. Bangkok: Justice for Peace Foundation.

Neher, C.D. (1979). Section III; Rural Political Process: Introduction In C. D. Neher (ed), Modern Thai Politics: From Village to Nation (pp. 189-196). Cambridge: Schenkman

Ockey, J. (2008). Elections and Political Integration in the Lower South of Thailand In M. J. Montesano & P. Jory (Eds.), Thai South and Malay North (pp.124-154). Singapore: NUS Press

Ockey, J. (2011). Individual imaginings: The religio-nationalist pilgrimages of Haji Sulong Abdulkadir alFatani. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 42(1), 89-119.

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (1998) Combating Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: The Role of OSCE (Warsaw: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human
Rights). Patani Raya for Peace (2016, June 9), Prachatai. Retrieved from https://prachatai.com/journal/2016/06/66235.

Petersen, R. D. (2002) Understanding Ethnic Violence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

Prapertchob, P. (2001). Islam and civil society in Thailand: The role of NGOs In N. Mitsuo, S. Siddique, & O. F. Banjunid (Eds.), Islam and civil
society in Southeast Asia, (pp.104-116). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Shewfelt, S. D. (2009). Legacies of war: Social and political life after wartime trauma. Yale University. SBPAC reveals 80 percent progress of the
civil society lessening Deep South violence project (2017, December 17), Manager Online, Retrieved from https://mgronline.com/south/detail/9600000126717

Thoms, O. N., & Ron, J. (2007). Do human rights violations cause internal conflict?. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(3), 674-705.

Verba, S., Nie, N. H., Barbic, A., Irwin, G., Molleman, H., & Shabad, G. (1973). The modes of participation: continuities in research. Comparative Political Studies, 6(2), 235-250.
How to Cite
Chantra, T. (2019). A MORE POWERFUL FORCE: EXAMINING NON-ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION DURING CONFLICT IN THE DEEP SOUTH OF THAILAND. Social Science Asia, 5(3), 38-54. Retrieved from https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/165
Research Article