• Wasan Sapphasuk Chiangmai University
  • Omsin Jatuporn Department of Educational Foundations and Development, Chiangmai University
Keywords: Social studies, Local history, Citizenship education, Curricular space


This paper focuses on how secondary social studies teachers implement local history education and their creation of a curricular space for promoting active citizenship in secondary school students. By drawing broadly on postmodern perspectives on curriculum and pedagogy, local history education under the sphere of social studies curriculum was examined through the lens of the instructional paradigm in order to challenge some of our assumptions about curriculum design. The achievement and employment of various awarenesses are emphasized in postmodern curriculum theory which supports the study of local history from multiple perspectives and allows teachers to take advantages of multiple local contexts found in the school areas. Thus, the results revealed that the teachers represented their role as curriculum leader and demonstrate sophisticated understandings of history education. They designed lessons around local history topics and included multiple perspectives with hope their students would be equipped with critical worldviews. In classroom practices, they had strategies to teach local history in meaningful, contextualized and challenging contexts, some planned extensive lessons to address multiple perspectives to local history throughout their curriculum. Insights gained have shed light that teachers have a curricular space for promoting active citizenship through local history education in social studies classrooms.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Wasan Sapphasuk, Chiangmai University

Wasan Sapphasuk is currently pursuing Doctor of Philosophy in Multicultural Education at Chiangmai University, Thailand. His main interests include curriculum studies, critical multicultural education and social studies education

Omsin Jatuporn, Department of Educational Foundations and Development, Chiangmai University

Omsin Jatuporn is currently working as a lecturer in the Department of Educational Foundations and Development at Chiangmai University, Thailand. His main interests include critical curriculum studies, cultural studies and cultural politics in education


Aktekin, S. (2010). The place and importance of local history in the secondary history education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 6(1), 86-105.

Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. A. (1981). Education under siege. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey.

Badley, K. & Hollabaugh, J. (2012). Metaphors for teaching and learning. Metaphors we teach by: How metaphors shape what we do in the classroom.
Eugene, OR: Wipf& Stock Publishers.

Barton, K.C. (2008). Research on students’ ideas about history. Handbook of research in social studies education. New York: Routledge.

Bernhardt, P. (2009). Opening up classroom space: Student voice, autobiography, and the curriculum. The High School Journal, 92(3), 61-67.

Brophy, J., & Van Sledright, B. (1997). Teaching and learning history in elementary schools. New York, NY: Teachers’ College Press.

Chen, H.L. (2008). A critical reflection on the reform of the high school history curriculum in Taiwan. Social Education in Asia: Critical Issues and Multiple Perspectives. Charlotte, N.C.: Information Age Publishing.

Danker, A.C. (2001a). All history is local: Using the familiar to teach and learn core knowledge topics. The New England Journal of History, 57(2),

Danker, A.C. (2001b). Keepers of tradition, agents of change: Social studies teachers and multicultural education. International Social Studies Forum, 1(1), 45-60.

Danker, A.C. (2003). Multicultural Social Studies: The local history connection. The Social Studies,94(2), 111-117.

Doll, W. (1993). A Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.

Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 503-520.

Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. Constructivism in education (pp.17-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Glesne, C. (1998). Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction. 2nd edition. Allyn & Bacon.

Harris, R., & Rae, A. (2006). Making history meaningful: Helping pupils see why history matters. Teaching history, 125, 28-33.

Henderson, J.G., & Hawthorne, R.D. (2000). Transformative Curriculum Leadership. 2nd edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Hirsch, E.D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Journell, W. (2011). Social studies, citizenship education and the search for an American identity: An argument against a unifying narrative. Journal of
Thought, 46(3-4), 5-24.

Kammen, C. (1995). The Pursuit of Local History: Readings on Theory and Practice. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press.

Kammen, C. (2003). On Doing Local History. 2d ed. Walnut Creek, California: AltaMira Press.

Kinloch, N. (2001). “Parallel catastrophes? Uniqueness, redemption and the Shoah”, Teaching history, 104, 8-14.

Levstik, L. S. (1997). “Any history is someone’s history”: Listening to multiple voices from the past. Social Education, 61(1), 48-51.

Levstik, L.S., & Barton, K.C. (2011). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. 4th edition. New York:Routledge.

Marino, M.P., & Crocco, M.S. (2012). Doing local history: A case study of New Brunswick, New Jersey, The Social Studies, 103(6), 233-240.

Mukdawijitra, Y. (2013). Southeast Asia in Thai school textbooks. Expert meeting: Promoting intercultural dialogue and a culture of peace in
Southeast Asia through shared histories. Bangkok: UNESCO.

National Center for History in the Schools (NCHS). (1994). National standards for United States history:Exploring the American experience.Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.

Noel, A.M., & Colopy, M.A. (2006). Making history field trips meaningful: Teachers and site educators’ perspectives on teaching materials. Theory and
research in social education, 34,553-568.

Phillips, R. (2003). Past Forward: History, citizenship and identity. London:Historical Association.

Pinson, H. (2007). Inclusive curriculum? Challenges to the role of civic education in a Jewish and democratic state. Curriculum Inquiry, 37, 351-382.

Rittidet, P. (2011). Local youth historical research for students based learning reform, Northeast Thailand. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2),224-227.

Sasiwongsaroj, K. (2013). The central region amid a wave of changes: A synthesis of research projects on local history of the central region by
youth historians. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Khon Kaen University, 30(2), 107-132.

Slattery, P. (2006). Curriculum Development in the Postmodern Era. New York, NY: Routledge.

Stake (1995). The art of case study research. London: International Educational and Professional Publisher.

Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning. New York: MacMillan.

Varbelow, S. (2012). Instruction, curriculum and society: Iterations based on the ideas of William Doll. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 87-98.
How to Cite
Sapphasuk, W., & Jatuporn, O. (2020). LOCAL HISTORY AS TEACHERS’ CURRICULAR SPACE FOR PROMOTING CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION IN THAI PUBLIC SCHOOLS. Social Science Asia, 6(1), 13-26. Retrieved from https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/181
Research Article