CLIENTELISTIC NETWORKS IN THE 2019 THAI GENERAL ELECTION: EVIDENCE FROM ROI-ET PROVINCE

  • Suthikarn Meechan Mahasarakham University
Keywords: Thailand's Election, Clientelism, Local Networks, Political Party, Roi-Et Province

Abstract

Thailand's March 2019 election results have become noteworthy evidence of the power generated by local forces within constituencies. This article questions how political parties and local networks work toward achieving success in elections, particularly the upcoming local elections. Qualitative fieldwork was conducted in Roi-Et province, the strong political base of prominent anti-Junta parties and a region closely watched by the Military Junta. The study found that clientelistic strategies are used in electoral mobilization. This comprises cooperation between local politicians and vote canvassers, as well as vote-buying, including through infrastructure projects launched by the Junta government. Furthermore, the political landscape of the province is dominated by clientelistic networks, which involves political figures and potential group members who are perceived according to their function and are generally part of the families attached to political parties. Observation of various parties' involvement in elections demonstrated that political families are at the core of both competition and cooperation at several levels. These families also actively engage in local activities to maintain and strengthen their authority.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abuza, Z. (2019, June 1). Thailand‟s Stolen Election. Retrieved from The Diplomat: https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/thailands-stolen-election/

Anek, L. (1996). Song Nakhara Prachatipatai (in Thai) [A Tale of Two Democracies]. Bangkok: Matichon.

Anyarat, C. (2010). Thai Electoral Campaigning: Vote-Canvassing Networks and Hybrid Voting.Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 4(29), 95-97

Bjarnegård, E. (2010). Men in Politics: Revisiting Patterns of Gendered Parliamentary Representation in Thailand and Beyond. Ph.D. Dissertation. Uppsala University.

Callahan,W.; McCargo, D.,(1996). “VoteBuying in Thailand's Northeast: The July 1995 General Election”. Asian Survey, 36 (4), 376-392.

Ellis-Petersen, H. (2019, May 8). Thai parties cry foul after election results favour military junta. Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/08/thai-parties-cry-foul-afterelection-results-favour-military-junta

Jordan, J.(2017). The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Voter Turnout. WWU Honors Program Senior Projects 43. Retrieved from https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwu_honors/43 (30 August 2019).

Kaweewit, K., & Tassanee, V. (2019, February 19). Thai party challenging army rule holds first Bangkok rally. Retrieved from The Associated Press: https://apnews.com/bce5378a512f435da7b9caace107cc00.

McCargo, D. (2018).“Thailand‟s Changing Party Landscape”. ISEAS Perspective ISSUE: 2018 No. 63. Singapore: ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute

Mulder, N. (2000). Inside Thai Society: Religion, Everyday Life, Change. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

Nelson, M H. (2005). “Analyzing Provincial Political Structures in Thailand: phuak, trakun,and hua khanaen”. SEARC Working Paper Series, No. 97. Hong Kong: Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.

Nichter, S. C. (2010). Politics and Poverty: Electoral Clientelism in Latin America. Ph.D. Dissertation in Political Science. University of California, Berkeley.

Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ockey, J. (1996). Thai society and patterns of political leadership. Asian Survey, 36(4), 345-360. doi:10.1525/as.1996.36.4.01p0123g

Ockey, J. (2015). Thai political families: The impact of political inheritance. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 3(2), 191-211. doi:10.1017/trn.2015.1

Ockey, J.(2017). Team Work: Shifting Patterns and Relationships in Local and National Politics in Thailand. Sojourn, 32(3), 562-600.

Pasuk, P.; Sangsit P.; Nualnoi, T., (1998). Guns, girls, gambling, ganja: Thailand's illegal economy and public policy. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.

Pasuk, P.; Baker, C., Thaksin: The Business of Politics in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books.

Pattana, K. (2012). From red to red: An auto-ethnography of economic and political transitions in a Northeastern Thai village. In Montesano M. J., Pavin C., & Aekapol C., Bangkok May 2010: Perspectives on a Divided Thailand (230-247). Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Patpicha, T., & Johnson, K. (2019, May 16). Thai anti-junta leader says 'no giving up' on forming next government. Retrieved from Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/article/usthailand-election/thai-anti-juntaleader-says-no-giving-up-onforming-next-governmentidUSKCN1SL2HS

Prajak, K. (2009). “Nitan Saun Jai Wah Deaw Ngor Jon Jep Khuag : Maya Kati Rae Akati Khaug Nak Rattasat Thai” [Tales of Stupidity, Poverty, and Illness of Rural Voters: Myth and Bias of Thai Political Scientists]. Faw Dew Gun, 6(4), 140-155.

Punchada, S. (2019a). Thailand‟s Puzzling 2019 Election: How the NCPO Junta has embedded itself in Thai Politics. ISEAS Perspective ISSUE: 2019 No. 44 Singapore: ISEAS– Yusof Ishak Institute.

Punchada, S. (2019b). The Rules Change but the Players Don‟t: Factional Politics and Thailand‟s March 2019 Elections. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(3), 390–417.

Saowanee, T. A.,& McCargo, D. (2019). Exit, Voice, (Dis)loyalty? Northeast Thailand after the 2014 Coup. In M. Montesano, T. Chong, & M. Heng (Eds.), After the Coup: The National Council for Peace and Order Era and the Future of Thailand ( 90-113). Singapore : ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.

Saowanee, T. A.(2019). Isan : Double Trouble.Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 41(2), 183-189.

Siripan, N. S. (2013). The 2011 General Election for Thailand‟s House of Representatives: The Studies of the Roles of Political Parties, Voters‟ Political Behavior and Electoral Decisions under Political Conflict Situations. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University and the Office of the Election Commission of Thailand.

Siripan, N. S. (2019). Electoral integrity and the repercussions of institutional manipulations: The 2019 general election in Thailand. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891119892321.

Somchai, P.(2008).“The Thai Rak Thai party and elections in Northeastern Thailand”. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 38(1), 106-123.

Suthikarn, M. (2013). “Voting Behavior and Attitude toward Vote-Buying in the Notheastern Area : Case Study in Maha Sarakham”. Journal of King Prajadhipok's Institute, 10 (3), 110- 128.

Suthikarn, M. (2019). Clans and Networks: Thai Clientelistic Politics at the Local Level. Retrieved from Kyoto Review of Southeast Asia: https://kyotoreview.org/trendsetters/clans-and-networks-thaiclientelistic-politics-at-the-locallevel/

Teehankee, J. (2013). “Clientelism and party politics in the Philippines”. In Direk Tomsa and Andreas Ufen (Eds.), Party Politics in Southeast Asia : Clientelism and Electoral Competition in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines (pp. 186-214). Milton Park: Routledge.

Published
2020-10-30
How to Cite
Meechan, S. (2020). CLIENTELISTIC NETWORKS IN THE 2019 THAI GENERAL ELECTION: EVIDENCE FROM ROI-ET PROVINCE. Social Science Asia, 6(4), 1-20. Retrieved from https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/213
Section
Research Article