THE IMPACT OF AI APPROACH INTEGRATED TO SOAR FRAMEWORK ON LEADERSHIP STYLE, EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR : AN ACTION RESEARCH IN A FAMILY GUEST HOUSE IN SURABAYA, INDONESIA

  • Sugiono Sugiharto Petra Christian University
  • Gloria S. Chavez Assumption University
  • Perla Rizalina M. Tayko Tayko Assumption University
Keywords: Organization Development intervention (ODI), Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach, Strengths-Opportunities-Aspirations-Results (SOAR) framework, Leadership Style, Employee Engagement, Innovative Work Behavior

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of Appreciative Inquiry (AI) integrated into a Strengths-Opportunities-Aspirations-Results (SOAR) analysis, and used as an Organization Development Intervention (ODI), regarding the style of leadership, engagement of employees, and the innovative work behavior of employees, in a small lodging firm in Surabaya, Indonesia. Using an action research design, the ODI activities were carried out with 60 employees, over a six-month period. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to explore and gather data at all levels of the organization of the firm, and thus included top managers, supervisors, coordinators, and employees. The action research was conducted in three phases: pre-ODI, process of ODI, and post-ODI. The findings reveal that leadership style was improved, employee engagement was increased, and innovative work behavior was generated. Recommendations for further maintaining the organization’s improvement include the continued use of the Organization Development Interventions (ODI) by using AI integrated into the SOAR framework in three levels. Specifically, at the Organization level, the executives should continue their willingness to involve employees in problem solving and decision making, while at the Group level, the positive results of the ODI in generating synergy for working hand-in-hand within a functional team, and between functional teams in the firm, must continue. At the Individual level, the ODI, which is directed at the organizational and group levels to create a harmonious working environment will give each employee valuable experience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alum, R. A., & Drucker, P. F. (1986). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Public Productivity Review, 10(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.2307/3380320

Amabille, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.

CIPD employee engagement. (2009). [Factsheet]. Chartered Institute Of Personnel and Development. https://www.cipd.co.uk/knowledge/fundamentals/relations/engagement/factsheet

Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. K. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change (1st ed). Berrett-Koehler.

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organization development & change (9. ed., internat. student ed). South-Western.

de Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation (EIM Research Reports No. H200820). SCALES-initiative (SCientific AnaLysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs). http://ondernemerschap.panteia.nl/pdf-ez/h200820.pdf

Farr, J. L., & Ford, C. (1990). Individual innovation. In M. West & J. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 63–80). Wiley.

Gebauer, J., Lowman, D., & Gordon, J. (2009). Closing the engagement gap how great companies unleash employee potential for superior results. Portfolio.

Gill, Roger. (2011). Theory and practice of leadership (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Gill, Roger. (2013). Theory and practice of leadership (2nd ed. reprinted). Sage Publications.

Hersey, Paul., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (1996). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources. Prentice-Hall.

Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990). Champions of change: Identifying, understanding, and supporting champions of technological innovations. Organizational Dynamics, 19(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90047-S

Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038

Juneja, P. (2012). Elements of employee engagement. Management Study Guide. https://www.managementstudyguide.com/employee-engagement-dimensions.htm

Kanter, R. (1996). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Research in organization behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169–211). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016 /B978-0-7506-9749-1.50010-7

King, N., & Anderson, N. (2002). Managing innovation and change: A critical guide for organizations (2nd ed., reprinted). Thomson Learning.

Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi‐dimensional measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660

Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1

Nanus, Burt. (1995). Visionary leadership: Creating a compelling sense of direction for your organization. Jossey-Bass.

Oukes, T. (2010). Innovative work behavior: A case study at a tyre manufacturer [Master Thesis, University of Twente]. https://essay.utwente.nl/62728/1/Bacheloropdracht_T._Oukes_September_2011(publieke_versie).pdf

Pedraza, C. G., Bravo, E. R., Oliveira, H., & Blanco, F. (2012). Innovation in service firms: Perspective from innovative behavior. Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisational Learning, 104–112.

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.658656

Shane, S. A. (1994). Are champions different from non-champions? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90014-0

Stavros, J., & Hinrichs, G. (2007). SOARing to high and engaging performance: An appreciative approach to strategy. AI Practitioner, 1(1), 1–9.

Stavros, J. M., & Hinrichs, G. (2009). The thin book of SOAR building strengths-based strategy. Thin Book Pub. Co. http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?bookid=31738

Towers-Perrin. (2003). Working today: Understanding what drives employee engagement [The 2003 Towers Perrin Talent Report]. http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/getwebcachedoc?webc=hrs/usa/2003/200309/talent_2003.pdf

Van de Ven, A. H. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590

West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (Eds.). (1990). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Wiley.

Whitney, D. K., & Trosten-Bloom, A. (2003). The power of appreciative inquiry: A practical guide to positive change (1st ed). Berrett-Koehler.

Published
2021-02-23
How to Cite
Sugiharto, S., Chavez, G. S., & Tayko, P. R. M. T. (2021). THE IMPACT OF AI APPROACH INTEGRATED TO SOAR FRAMEWORK ON LEADERSHIP STYLE, EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT AND INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR : AN ACTION RESEARCH IN A FAMILY GUEST HOUSE IN SURABAYA, INDONESIA. Social Science Asia, 7(1), 15-33. Retrieved from https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/229
Section
Research Article