• Marissa Chantamas Assumption University
Keywords: In-process CSR, Exposure Time, Satisfaction, Brand Equity, Ethical Perception


This study examines the impact of ethical perceptions resulting from exposure to In-Process Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). It has been found that this relationship is moderated by the duration of exposure to in-process CSR through online brand communications. The study was conducted under the context of a government bank tasked with a mission to assist customers in restructuring their debt. The study was conducted using a sequential mixed research methodology suitable for exploratory research. The initial qualitative phase was conducted using in-depth interviews from 14 respondents. For the quantitative study, data were collected from 208 bank customers. Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for the analysis, it was found that ethical perception does have a significant impact on satisfaction, and brand equity, which reflects the in-process CSR. Also, satisfaction has a positive impact on brand equity. The impact on brand equity is moderated by the duration of exposure to in-process CSR, which is the theoretical implication of this study. As for managerial implications, it was found that ethical perception through in-process CSR, defined as taking to heart the benefits for customers and society, has an impact on brand equity. Thus, engaging in philanthropic activities is not sufficient, it is important for companies to have the best interests of customers and society in mind. The study was conducted on clients of a bank which has ethical consideration embedded in its mission and competency. Future studies could examine related constructs such as brand identification, brand trust, and social trust.


Download data is not yet available.


Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization, Academy of Management Review 14(1), 20–39.

Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. (2000). Self-categorization, affective commitment, and group self-esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555–577.

Bhattacharya, C.B., Korschun, Daniel and Sen, Sankar (2009). Strengthening stakeholder-company relationships through mutually beneficial corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 85, pp. 257-272.

Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, Sankar (2009). Corporate social responsibility in marketing. In: N.C. Smith and G. Lenssen, eds. 2009. Mainstreaming corporate responsibility. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Ch 20.

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California management review, 47(1), 9-24.

Bloemer, J., De Ruyter, K., & Peeters, P. (1998). Investigating drivers of bank loyalty: the complex relationship between image, service quality and satisfaction. International Journal of bank marketing, 16(7), 276-286.

Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. Journal of marketing, 61(1), 68-84.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Do environmental CSR initiatives serve organizations’ legitimacy in the oil industry? Exploring employees’ reactions through organizational identification theory. Journal of business ethics, 110(4), 397-412.

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2007) ‘Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.

Fatma, M., Rahman, Z., & Khan, I. (2015). Building company reputation and brand equity through CSR: the mediating role of trust. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(6), 840-856.

Fernando, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the wake of the Asian tsunami: Effect of time on the genuineness of CSR initiatives. European Management Journal, 28(1), 68-79.

Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). Is the perception of ‘goodness’ good enough? Exploring the relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee organizational identification. Journal of business ethics, 114(1), 15-27.

Høgevold, N. M., & Svensson, G. (2012). A business sustainability model: a European case study. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

Holehonnur, A., Raymond, M. A., Hopkins, C. D., & Fine, A. C. (2009). Examining the customer equity framework from a consumer perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 17(3), 165-180.

Hur, W. M., Kim, H., & Woo, J. (2014). How CSR leads to corporate brand equity: Mediating mechanisms of corporate brand credibility and reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 75-86.

Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22.

Kenny, D. A., & McCoach, D. B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modeling. Structural equation modeling, 10(3), 333-351.

Kim, J., Taylor, C. R., Kim, K. H., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Measures of perceived sustainability. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(2), 182-193.

Kim, S., & Lee, Y.J. (2012). The complex attribution process of CSR motives. Public Relations View, 38(2012), 168 – 170.

Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2005). Corporate social responsibility. Hoboken.

Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel psychology,

(1), 1-49.

Lai, C. S., Chiu, C. J., Yang, C. F., & Pai, D. C. (2010). The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of business ethics, 95(3), 457-469.

Lee, K. Y., Huang, H. L., & Hsu, Y. C. (2007). Trust, satisfaction and commitment-on loyalty to international retail service brands. Asia Pacific Management Review, 12(3), 161-169.

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of marketing, 70(4), 1-18.

Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer research, 20(3), 451-466.

Nonthanathorn, P. (2015). CSR and Social Enterprise Roles for Social Problem Solving. Journal of Social Development, 17(2), 13 – 34.

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. NY: McGraw-Hill.

Park, E., Kim, K. J., & Kwon, S. J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of consumer loyalty: An examination of ethical standard, satisfaction, and trust. Journal of Business Research, 76, 8-13.

Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2011). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117-135.

Pérez, A., & Rodriguez del Bosque, I. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty: exploring the role of identification, satisfaction and type of company. Journal of Services Marketing, 29(1), 15-25.

Piercy, N.F. and Lane, N., (2009). Corporate social responsibility: impacts on strategic marketing and customer value. The Marketing Review, 9(4), pp. 335-360.

Poolthong, Y., & Mandhachitara, R. (2009). Customer expectations of CSR, perceived service quality and brand effect in Thai retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(6), 408-427.

Prayukvong, P., & Olsen, M. (2009). Research on the CSR development in Thailand.

Rajanakorn, N. (2012). Examining Corporate Social Responsibility in Thailand: A View from Thai Companies.

Rao, Sally, and Chad Perry (2003). Convergent interviewing to build a theory in under-researched areas: principles and an example investigation of internet usage in inter-firm relationships. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 6.4: 236-247.

Sierra, V., Iglesias, O., Markovic, S., & Singh, J. J. (2017). Does ethical image build equity in corporate services brands? The influence of customer perceived ethicality on affect, perceived quality, and equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 144(3), 661-676.

Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya (2001), Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Marketing Research (JMR) 38(2), 225–243.

Srisupaolarn, P. (2013), From Altruistic to Strategic CSR: How Social Value Affected CSR Development – a case study of Thailand, Social Responsibility Journal. Vol. 9 Iss 1 pp. 56 – 77.

Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2006). Service-dominant logic: Reactions, reflections and refinements. Marketing theory, 6(3), 281-288.

How to Cite
Chantamas, M. (2021). EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF EXPOSURE TIME TO IN-PROCESS CSR ON SATISFACTION AND BRAND EQUITY. Social Science Asia, 7(1), 53-65. Retrieved from https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/232
Research Article