• Akarawin Sasanapitak Phranakon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University
  • Somsak Amornsiripong Mahidol University
Keywords: Public-Private Partnership, New Public Governance, Smart City, Social Inequality


This article aimed to explain the concept of smart city development which requires a special pattern that is smart city governance. The concept is related to the concept of the new public governance, which is a new paradigm of public administration since the traditional public governance may not be suitable for the development, causing a delay and inability to adapt to the development based on the globalization era. It could not provide a solution to the problems and needs of the people. The new public governance prioritizes network management and is not limited only to the public sector but also encourages the private sector and civil society sector to participate in the provision of public services. It gives importance to public services delivered to the general public effectively and inclusively through a public-private partnership model of governance cooperation, which is a form of promoting cooperation in public service provision between the public and private sectors in current public governance. It is expected to be a strategy that facilitates smart city governance by utilizing technology to facilitate the general public in accessing public services. This would reduce social inequality. In Thailand, the example of a public-private partnership in smart city development was the establishment of a city development company. Currently, city development companies have been established in 10 provinces all over Thailand.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities ?. Cities, 60 (1), 234 - 245.

Akarawin Sasanapitak, Noppon Akahat. (2016). Governance: Concept and Development to Local Government). ARU Research Journal, 3 (3), 63-70. [In Thai]

Akarawin Sasanapitak. (2020). The Development of Local Smart City Model to Reduce Social Inequality. Dissertation of Doctor of Public Administration, Program in Public Policy and Public Management, Mahidol University, Nakornpathom.

Akarawin Sasanapitak, Somsak Amornsiripong. (2021). The Synthesis of Smart City Roles Affecting to Reduce Social Inequality: The Meta - Synthesis. Political Science and Public Administration Journal. 12 (Suppl. 1), 7-28. [In Thai].

Akarawin Sasanapitak. (2022). Smart City: The Synthesis of Meaning. School of Administrative Studies Journal. 5(1), p.126-141. [In Thai].

Bansal, N., Mukherjee, M., & Gairola, A. (2017). From poverty, inequality to Smart City. Springer Transactions in Civil & Environmental Engineering, 109 - 122.

Bolivar, M. P. R., & Meijer, A. J. (2016). Smart governance: Using a literature review and empirical analysis to build a research model.Social Science Computer Review, 34 (6), 673 - 695.

Chourabi et al,. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. Proceeding of HICSS 45th Hawaii International conference on System Science, IEEE, 2289 - 2297.

European Commission. (2003). Guidelines for Successful Public - Private Partnerships. Retrieved 25 July 2021.

Hardoy, J.E., Mitlin, D., Satterthwaite, D. (2013). Environmental Problems in an Urbanizing World. Routledge: New York.

Hollands, R. G. (2014). Critical intervention into the cooperate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, January 27, 2015.

James H. Spencer. (2015). Globalization and urbanization: the global urban ecosystem. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

Jureeporn Wanmontri & Supawatanakorn Wongthanavasu. (2020). Key Actors in Collaborating with the Development of Khon Kaen’s Smart City. Governance Journal, 9(1), p.262-303. [In Thai].

Kourtit, K., Kijkamp, P., Arribas, D. (2012). Smart cities in perspective - A comparative European study by mean of self-organizing maps. Innovation:The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 229 – 246.

Meijer, A., Bolivar, M. P. R. (2016). Governing the smart city: a review of the literature on smart urban governance. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82 (2), 392 - 408.

Nam T, Pardo T.A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceeding of 12th Conference on Digital Government Research, College Park, MD, June 12–15 2011.

Natcha Khiangprakhong. (2016). Legal Problems on the investment in State Undertaking under the Private Investment in State Undertaking Act B.E. 2556. Thammasat Business Law Journal, Vol.6, 2016, [In Thai].

Odendaal, N. (2003). Information and communication technology and local governance: Understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27 (6), 585 - 607.

Osborne P. S, (2010). Introduction the (New) Public Governance: a suitable case for treatment?. In S. P. Osborne. (Eds.). The New Public Governance: Emerging Perspective on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London and New York: Routledge.

Prakorn Siriprakob. (2016). 3 Paradigms of Public Administration: Concept, theories, and Practices. 2^nd Ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.

Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997).Understanding Governance, Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Thailand Parliamentary Budget Report. (2017). The Analysis of Public and Private Partnership. Bangkok: The Secretariat parliament of Thailand. [In Thai]

Thansettakij Newspaper. (2017). City Development Company were established in 10 Provinces.., No. 37 (3,315), 19 - 22 November 2017. [In Thai].

The Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2018). Poverty and Inequality Analysis Report in Thailand 2017. Bangkok: The Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. [In Thai].

The Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2018). The facts about the situation of inequality in Thailand. Retrieved 7 Nov. 2019. [In Thai].

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP). Retrieved 27 Dec. 2019.

Thuzar, M. (2011). Urbanization in South East Asia: Developing Smart Cities for the Future?. Regional Outlook. 96-100.

United Nations. (2011).World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affair. Retrieved 24 Jan.2020.

United Nations (2015). World Urbanization prospects. The 2014 revision. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affair.

Uthai Laohawichian. (2015). Public Administration in Thailand: Changes in subject characteristics and Trends. Public Administration in Thailand: Change, Development, and Trends. School of Public Administration. The National of Institute of Development Administration. Bangkok: Sukumvit Media. 51-84. [In Thai].

Yingitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K., Westerman, C. (2008). The Making of Knowledge Cities: Melbourne’s Knowledge-based Urban Development Experience. Cities, 25(2), 63 - 72.

Yingitcanlar, T., Sabatini-Marques, J., Costa, E. M., Kamruzzaman , M., Ioppolo, G. (2017). Stimulation technological innovation through incentives:Perceptions of Australian and Brazilian firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, Md., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., Da Costa, E., Ioppolo, G., (2019). Can cities become smart without being sustainable? A systematic review of the literature. Sustainable Cities and Society. 45, 348-365.

How to Cite
Research Article