Preparatory Offences: a Challenge to Criminal Law Boundaries, Democracy and Human Rights Principles

  • Ronnakorn Bunmee Thammasat University

Abstract

It is true that one of the principal objectives of law is ‘the care of security’. And the most powerful weapon in this war to protect security, one might first think, is the criminal law. We should therefore desire our criminal law to be as strong as possible to match the threats caused by harmful conduct in order to ensure our safety. However, even though we might gain better personal security against criminal conduct through stronger criminal law, we also simultaneously risk undermining the other side of the coin of security which is political security against State interference i.e. liberty. Therefore, too strong criminal law is as dangerous as weak criminal law. In this sense, criminal law is a double-edged sword. To strike a balance, criminal law must respect the liberty of both potential victims and the potentially accused; if either side has been unjustifiably favoured, the citizenry will be at risk of either being unnecessarily victimized or unfairly criminalized. None the less, in the thirst for security especially when facing serious harm, the State tends to ignore the balance and opts to extend the boundaries of criminal law in an unprincipled manner. Many types of preventive criminal laws have been increasingly used in order to pre-empt prohibited harm.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Ashworth A and Horder J, Principle of Criminal Law (7th edn, OUP 2012)

Ashworth A and Zedner L, Preventive Justice, (OUP 2014)

Ashworth A, Zedner L, Tomlin P (eds), Prevention and the Limits of the Criminal Law (OUP 2013)

Ashworth A, Positive Obligations in Criminal Law (Hart 2013)

Baker D, The Right not to be Criminalized: Demarcating Criminal Law’s Authority (Ashgate 2012)

Bentham J and Bowring J, The works of Jeremy Bentham (W. Tait 1843)

Bronitt S, McSherry B and Norrie AW, Regulating Deviance: the redirection of criminalisation and the futures of criminal Law (Hart 2008)

Brudner A, Punishment and Freedom (OUP 2009)

Clarkson CMV, Keating HM and Cunningham SR, (7th edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2010)

De Frías AS, Samuel K and White ND (Eds), Counter-Terrorism: International Law and Practice (OUP 2012)

Doswald-Beck L, Human Rights in Times of Conflict and Terrorism (OUP 2011)

Duff A and Green S (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (OUP 2011)

____________________, Defining Crimes: Essays on The Special Part of the Criminal Law (2012 OUP)

Duff RA, Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law (Hart 2007)

_______, Criminal Attempts (Clarendon 1996)

_______, Farmer L, Marshall SE, Renzo M, and Tadros V (eds), The Structures of the Criminal Law (OUP 2011)

Feinberg J, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 1: Harm to Others (OUP 1984)

Fletcher GP, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (OUP 1998)

Gross H, A Theory of Criminal Justice (OUP 1979)

Harris DJ, O’Boyle M, Bates EP and Buckley CM, Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, (2nd edn, OUP 2009)

Herring J, Criminal Law: Text, Cases and Material, (5th edn, OUP 2012)

Husak D, Overcriminaliztion: the Limits of the Criminal Law, (Oxford Scholarship Online 2008)

John Gardner, Offences and Defences, (OUP 2007)

LaFave W.R, Criminal Law (West Group 2000)

Michael Moore, Placing Blame: A Theory of Criminal Law, (OUP 1997)

Murphy CC, EU Counter-Terrorism Law, Pre-Emption and the Rule of Law (Hart 2012)

Ramsay P, The Insecurity State: Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right t Security in the Criminal Law (OUP 2012)

Simester AP and Smith ATH (eds), Harm and Culpability, (OUP 1996)

Simester AP and Sullivan GR, Simester and Sullivan's Criminal law: theory and doctrine (4th edn, Hart 2009)

Simester AP and von Hirsch A, Crimes, Harms and Wrongs (Hart 2011)

Sullivan GR and Dennis I (eds), Seeking Security: Pre-Empting the Commission of Criminal Harms (Hart 2012)

Tadros V, The Ends of Harm: the Moral Foundations of Criminal Law (OUP 2011)

White RCA and Ovey C, Jacobs, White, & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (5th edn, OUP 2010)

Zedner L, Security (Routledge 2009)

Journal Articles

Ashworth A, ‘The Unfairness of Risk-Based Possession Offences’ (2001) 5 (3) Criminal Law and Philosophy 237-257

Du Bois-Pedain A, ‘The Wrongfulness Constraint in Criminalisation’ (2014) 8 (1) Criminal Law and Philosophy 149-169

Husak D, ‘Reservations About’ (2011) 14 (1) New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 97-107

Kolber A, ‘Against Proportional Punishment’ (2013) 66 Vanderbilt Law Review, 1141-1179

New C, 'Time and Punishment' (1992) 52 (1) Analysis 35-40

Ohana D, ‘Desert and Punishment for Acts: Preparatory to the Commission of a Crime’ (2007) 20Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence113-142

Ramsay P, ‘Overcriminalization as Vulnerable Citizenship’ (2010) 13 (2) New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 262-285

_________, ‘The Responsible Subject As Citizen: Criminal Law, Democracy and The Welfare State’ (2006) 69 (1) The Modern Law Review29 -58

Rogers J, ‘The Codification of Attempts and the case for ‘preparation’’’ (2008) 12Criminal Law Review 937-950

Simester AP and von Hirsch A, ‘Rethinking the Offence Principle’ (2002) 8 (3) Legal Theory 269-295

Smilansky S, ‘The Time to Punish’ (1994) 54 (1) Analysis 50-53

Smit VZ and Ashworth A, ‘Disproportionate Sentences as Human Violations’ (2004) 67 (4) Modern Law Review, 541-560

Von Hirsch A, ‘Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment’ (1992) 16 Chicago Journals: Crime and Justice 55-98

Waldron J, ‘Security and Liberty: The Image of Balance’ (2003) 11 (2) The Journal of Political Philosophy 191-210

________, ‘Torture and Positive Law: Jurisprudence for the White House’ (2005) 105 (6) Columbia Law Review 1681-1750

Wechsler H, ‘The Challenge of a Model Penal Code’ (May 1952) 65 Harvard Law Review 1097-1133

Zedner L, ‘Preventive Justice or Pre-Punishment? The Case of Control Orders’ (2007) 60 Current Legal Problems 174-203

Cases

Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for Defence (2007) UKHL 58

Al-Jedda v United Kingdom (2011) 53 EHRR 23, [2011] ECHR 1092, 30 BHRC 637

Bozano v France A 111 (1987) 9 EHRR 297

Guzzardi v Italy A 39 (1981) 3 EHRR 333, (App.7367/76)

Ireland v United Kingdom A 25 (1978) (Grand Chamber) 2 EHRR 25

Kudla v Poland (2000) 35 EHRR 198

LCB v United Kingdom 1998-III, 27 EHRR 212, (App.23413/94)

Mahmut Kaya v Turkey ECHR 2000-III, (App.22535/93)

Mastromatteo v Italy 2002-VIII (Grand Chamber) (App. 37703/97)

McCann v United Kingdom A 324 (1995), 21 EHRR 97

Moldovan and others v Romania (2007) 44 EHRR 302, (Apps. 41138/98 and 64320/01)

Osman v United Kingdom 1998-VIII, 29 EHRR 245

Ramsahai and others v The Netherlands (2008) (Grand Chamber), 46 EHRR 983, (App.52391/99)

Selcuk and Asker v Turkey (1998) 26 EHRR 477, (Apps. 23184/94 and 23185/94)

Silver and others v United Kingdom A 61 (1983) 5 EHRR 347, (Apps. 55947/72, 6205/73,

7052/75, 7061/75, 7107/75, 7113/75, and 7136/75)

Soering v United Kingdom A 161 (1989), 11 EHRR 439, (App.14038/88)

Steur v the Netherlands (2004) 39 EHRR 706, (App. 39657/98)

Tanli v Turkey 2001-III, 38 EHRR 31

Tyrer v United Kingdom A 26 (1978) 2 EHRR 1, (App.5856/72)

Weeks v United Kingdom A 114 (1987), 10 EHRR 293

X and Y v The Netherlands A 91 (1985) 8 EHRR 235

Government Reports

David Anderson, Report of the Independent Reviewer on the Operation of the Terrorism Act 2000 and Part 1 of the Terrorism Act 2006, July 2013

______________Report on the Operation in 2010 of the Terrorism Act 2000 and Part 1 of
the Terrorism 2006, July 2011

Joint Committee on Human Rights, Government Response to the Committee’s First Report of Session 2006-07: The Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism, Thirteenth Report of Session 2007-08, 26 February 2008

Law Commission, Conspiracy and Attempts (Law Com No 183, 2007)

______________, Conspiracy and Attempts (Law Com No 318, 2009)

Sentencing Advisory Council (Melbourne Victoria Australia), Review of Maximum Penalties for Preparatory Offences, December 2006
Published
2016-07-29
How to Cite
Bunmee, R. (2016). Preparatory Offences: a Challenge to Criminal Law Boundaries, Democracy and Human Rights Principles. Social Science Asia, 2(3), 1-29. Retrieved from https://socialscienceasia.nrct.go.th/index.php/SSAsia/article/view/51
Section
Research Article